CARA
CMS-Administered Risk Arrangements (CARA)
CARA is a voluntary initiative exclusively available to Global Risk ACOs that enables downstream episode-based risk arrangements (EBRAs) between ACOs and their Preferred Providers (specialists). CARA represents CMS’s most significant step toward bringing MA-style downstream risk into Original Medicare. (RFA §X.C)
CARA builds upon the existing shadow bundles data initiative, which has provided episodic data and pricing information to ACOs in ACO REACH, MSSP, and KCC since 2024. Shadow bundles are informational only; no financial risk is attached. CARA operationalizes this data by enabling actual financial accountability. (RFA §X.C)
Two Participation Options (RFA §X.C, Appendix E §E.2)
Default Approach:
- ACOs select from CMS-constructed Episode-Based Cost Measures (EBCMs)
- Predicated on CMS methodology with slight modifications for the LEAD performance year
- ACOs may not customize episode construction (trigger codes, episode length, etc.)
- ACOs can: specify discounts/premiums to target prices, select quality measures for performance adjustment, and define performance adjustment specifications
- Best for ACOs new to episode-based contracting
Maximal Flexibility (“Max Flex”) Option:
- ACOs select one or more existing EBCMs and customize the episode(s)
- Modifications can include: trigger codes, episode length, and other construction parameters
- ACOs may partner with external vendors for alternate episode construction methodologies
- All parameters subject to CMS review and finalization through the CMS 4i platform
- Best for ACOs with sophisticated data analytics and existing episode-based experience
Episode Types Available in CARA
CARA draws its episode definitions from CMS’s Episode-Based Cost Measures (EBCMs), the same measures used in the MIPS cost category under the Quality Payment Program. CMS chose EBCMs over the BPCI Advanced clinical episode groups used in the shadow bundles initiative because Preferred Providers are already familiar with EBCMs from MIPS reporting. (RFA Appendix E §E.2)
EBCMs are constructed using comprehensive Medicare Parts A and B claims data with risk adjustment for patient age and disease complexity. They fall into three categories, with acute medical and procedural episodes available at LEAD launch (PY 2027) and chronic condition episodes phased in early in the initiative. (RFA Appendix E §E.2)
Key Insight: The RFA describes these episodes as “considered for inclusion”; the final list may be narrowed or expanded before PY 2027. CMS will deliver episode-specific reports with target prices through the 4i platform in 2027 once ACOs sign the LPACA and submit a data request.
Acute Inpatient Medical Episodes
These address urgent clinical conditions requiring immediate hospital-based intervention. The specialist (hospitalist, intensivist, or relevant subspecialist) is accountable for the cost of the inpatient episode from trigger through a defined post-discharge window.
| Episode | Clinical Context | Likely Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Sepsis | Systemic infection requiring inpatient management, often ICU-level care | Inpatient admission with sepsis diagnosis |
| Psychoses and Related Conditions | Acute psychiatric hospitalization | Inpatient admission with psychosis/schizophrenia diagnosis |
| Intracranial Hemorrhage or Cerebral Infarction | Stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) | Inpatient admission with stroke diagnosis |
| Respiratory Infection Hospitalization | Pneumonia, influenza, and other acute respiratory infections requiring inpatient care | Inpatient admission with respiratory infection diagnosis |
| Inpatient COPD Exacerbation | Acute worsening of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Inpatient admission with COPD exacerbation diagnosis |
| Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage | Acute lower GI bleeding requiring hospitalization | Inpatient admission with lower GI hemorrhage diagnosis |
| Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) | Emergent or urgent cardiac catheterization with stenting | Inpatient admission with PCI procedure code |
Procedural Episodes
These encompass surgical and interventional procedures with defined start and end points. The specialist performing the procedure is accountable for the episode cost, including pre-operative workup and post-operative recovery within the episode window.
Orthopedic Procedures
| Episode | Clinical Context | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Arthroplasty | Total or partial knee replacement | One of the highest-volume Medicare procedures. Well-tested in BPCI Advanced with established savings opportunity. |
| Elective Primary Hip Arthroplasty | Total hip replacement (elective, non-fracture) | Similar savings profile to knee arthroplasty. Excludes hip fracture (which is acute, not elective). |
| Lumbar Spine Fusion for Degenerative Disease (1–3 levels) | Spinal fusion surgery for degenerative conditions | High cost variability driven by device selection, post-acute care utilization, and complication rates. |
Cardiovascular Procedures
| Episode | Clinical Context | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elective Outpatient PCI | Planned cardiac stenting performed in outpatient setting | Distinguished from inpatient PCI (which is in the acute medical category). Lower cost, different risk profile. |
| Non-Emergent CABG | Planned coronary artery bypass graft surgery | High-cost episode with significant post-acute and readmission cost components. |
| Revascularization for Lower Extremity Chronic Critical Limb Ischemia | Vascular procedures to restore blood flow in severe peripheral artery disease | Complex patient population, often with diabetes and renal disease comorbidities. |
General Surgery Procedures
| Episode | Clinical Context | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Melanoma Resection | Surgical removal of melanoma | Episode includes pathology, imaging, and post-surgical follow-up. |
| Colon and Rectal Resection | Partial or total colectomy/proctectomy | High variability in length of stay and complication rates. |
| Femoral or Inguinal Hernia Repair | Surgical repair of groin hernias | Common, relatively lower-cost procedure. Savings opportunity primarily in site-of-service (inpatient vs. outpatient). |
| Lumpectomy, Partial Mastectomy, Simple Mastectomy | Breast cancer surgical procedures | Three related episodes covering the spectrum of breast cancer surgery. |
Other Procedural Episodes
| Episode | Clinical Context | Specialty |
|---|---|---|
| Renal or Ureteral Stone Surgical Treatment | Lithotripsy or surgical stone removal | Urology |
| Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation | Cataract surgery with intraocular lens | Ophthalmology (highest-volume Medicare procedure) |
| Screening/Surveillance Colonoscopy | Preventive or follow-up colonoscopy | Gastroenterology |
| Hemodialysis Access Creation | AV fistula or graft placement for dialysis access | Vascular surgery / nephrology |
| Acute Kidney Injury Requiring New Inpatient Dialysis | New-onset dialysis during hospitalization for AKI | Nephrology / hospital medicine |
Chronic Condition Episodes Phased In After Launch
These capture the ongoing management of long-term conditions requiring sustained specialist involvement. Unlike acute and procedural episodes (which have defined start and end points), chronic condition episodes measure cost over a defined period (typically 12 months) for patients with an established diagnosis. These will be phased in early in the initiative and are not available at PY 2027 launch.
| Episode | Clinical Context | Managing Specialty |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes | Ongoing management of Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes | Endocrinology / primary care |
| Heart Failure | Chronic heart failure management including medication optimization and monitoring | Cardiology |
| Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) | Progressive kidney disease management (pre-dialysis) | Nephrology |
| End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) | Dialysis-dependent kidney failure management | Nephrology |
| Asthma / COPD | Ongoing management of chronic respiratory disease | Pulmonology |
| Depression | Chronic depression management | Psychiatry / behavioral health |
| Low Back Pain | Chronic low back pain management (non-surgical) | Orthopedics / pain management / rheumatology |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis | Autoimmune joint disease management including biologic therapy | Rheumatology |
| Prostate Cancer | Ongoing prostate cancer management (active surveillance, treatment, monitoring) | Urology / oncology |
| Kidney Transplant Management | Post-transplant immunosuppression and monitoring | Nephrology / transplant surgery |
RISE to Age in Place Episode (Falls Prevention)
RISE (Resilience and Independence in a Safe Environment) to Age in Place is a falls prevention episode provided in addition to EBCMs. Structurally distinct from the EBCM episodes above, it is a bundled payment for a time-limited home-based intervention, not a cost measure with a target price. (RFA §X.C)
| Component | Detail |
|---|---|
| Initial evaluation | Paid through standard FFS. Screening assessment to determine eligibility and care needs. |
| Bundled payment | Covers an interdisciplinary care team (OTs and RNs) delivering: risk assessments, medication management, strength training, balance exercises, and provider communication plans. |
| Home modifications | Up to $2,500 for structural improvements (grab bars, ramps, lighting, non-slip surfaces) when warranted. Funded by the ACO, not Trust Fund dollars. |
| Target price | None. Unlike EBCM episodes, RISE to Age in Place does not have a target price or reconciliation against a benchmark. |
| Payment mechanism | CMS establishes Level II HCPCS (non-payable zeroed-out G-codes) for RN and OT services. Episode costs flow into the ACO’s PY expenditures. |
| PQP credit | ACOs implementing this episode may satisfy the Prevention and Quality Plan requirement. |
How Episode Pricing Works
ACOs do not calculate target prices themselves. Here is the process: (RFA Appendix E §E.4–E.5)
- CMS delivers episode reports (2027): After the ACO signs the LPACA and submits a HIPAA-Covered Data Disclosure Request Form, CMS delivers annual reports through the 4i platform containing target prices for each available episode, specific to the ACO’s patient population. These reports are similar to the shadow bundles data already provided to REACH and MSSP ACOs.
- ACO identifies specialists: Using the episode data, the ACO identifies which Preferred Providers have significant episode volume and cost variability; these are the best candidates for EBRAs.
- ACO and specialist negotiate: The parties negotiate a discount or premium to the CMS-provided target price, select quality measures (default: Q484, risk-standardized hospital admission rates for MCC patients, or a custom MIPS-comparable measure), and agree on a performance adjustment (10%–100% range). (RFA Appendix E §E.9.5–E.9.7)
- Parameters submitted to CMS: The ACO enters the negotiated episode risk parameters into the 4i platform. CMS reviews for clinical appropriateness and operational feasibility. (RFA Appendix E §E.3)
- Episodes trigger in the next PY: Once approved, episodes begin triggering. CMS provides quarterly performance reports starting tentatively Q1 2028. (RFA Appendix E §E.5)
- Settlement: At LEAD Final Financial Settlement, CMS compares actual FFS payments for each episode against the risk-adjusted target price. Preferred Providers receive reconciliation payments (if FFS < target) or owe repayments (if FFS > target). Episode costs are included in the ACO’s PY expenditures. (RFA Appendix E §E.9.8)
Key Insight: Where to Find EBCM Specifications
The detailed episode construction rules (trigger codes, episode windows, attribution logic, exclusion criteria, risk adjustment methodology) are not in the LEAD RFA. They are maintained separately by CMS as part of the Quality Payment Program. The full EBCM specifications are available here. ACOs should review these specifications now to understand episode construction before CARA data becomes available in 2027.
Key Insight: CARA vs. BPCI Advanced
While CARA builds on the shadow bundles initiative (which used BPCI Advanced methodology), CARA uses EBCM methodology, not BPCI specifications. The episode construction details (trigger codes, windows, exclusions) may differ. Additionally, CARA episodes are nested within the ACO’s total cost of care settlement, creating dual accountability that BPCI Advanced (a standalone model) does not have. The Max Flex option (allowing ACOs to customize episode construction with external vendors) has no BPCI equivalent.
Settlement Mechanics (RFA §X.C)
CARA episode costs are factored into the ACO’s expenditures during LEAD financial settlement. CMS calculates payments based on each Preferred Provider’s performance against the target price:
- Preferred Provider FFS payments < target price: Provider may be eligible for a reconciliation payment (savings sharing)
- Preferred Provider FFS payments > target price: Provider may owe a repayment
This creates dual accountability: the ACO is accountable for total cost of care through LEAD settlement, and the specialist is accountable for episode-specific performance through CARA.
Key Rules
- CARA is exclusively for Global Risk ACOs (RFA §X.C)
- Only Preferred Providers (not Participant TINs) can participate in CARA (RFA Table 1)
- Providers that elect NPCC or APO may not participate in CARA simultaneously (RFA §X.A.3)
- Episode risk parameters are subject to CMS review through the 4i platform (RFA Appendix E §E.3)
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. CARA is designed for Preferred Providers (specialists). Preferred Providers that elect NPCC or APO cannot simultaneously participate in CARA. (RFA §X.C)
Shadow bundles are informational: ACOs receive episode data but no financial risk is attached. CARA operationalizes this data: actual reconciliation payments or repayments flow based on specialist performance against target prices.
The RFA describes these as two distinct participation options. CMS will specify whether ACOs can mix approaches in methodology papers.
CARA episode costs are included in the ACO’s PY expenditures. The ACO’s savings/losses at settlement reflect both CARA episode performance and all other spending. The CARA reconciliation with the specialist is a separate downstream settlement.
The EBCM specifications are published by CMS as part of the Quality Payment Program, not in the LEAD RFA. Visit cms.gov/medicare/quality/value-based-programs/cost-measures/about for the full technical specifications including trigger codes, episode windows, attribution logic, and risk adjustment methodology.
No. CARA uses Episode-Based Cost Measures (EBCMs) from the MIPS cost category, not the BPCI Advanced clinical episode groups. While conceptually similar, the episode construction details (trigger codes, windows, exclusions) may differ. CMS chose EBCMs because Preferred Providers are already familiar with them from MIPS reporting.
Chronic condition episodes (diabetes, heart failure, CKD, ESRD, asthma/COPD, depression, low back pain, rheumatoid arthritis, prostate cancer, kidney transplant management) will be phased in early in the initiative, likely PY 2028 or PY 2029. Only acute medical and procedural episodes are available at PY 2027 launch.
CMS calculates risk-adjusted target prices using the EBCM methodology and delivers them to ACOs through the 4i platform. ACOs and Preferred Providers then negotiate a discount or premium to the CMS-provided target price. CMS does not set the final negotiated price; it provides the baseline and the parties negotiate from there.
The performance adjustment links quality performance to financial outcomes. ACOs select quality measures for each EBRA (default: Q484 risk-standardized hospital admission rates, or a custom MIPS-comparable measure). The adjustment percentage is negotiated between the ACO and specialist, with a minimum of 10% and maximum of 100%. Quality performance can modify the reconciliation payment or repayment by 10–100%.
Yes, but not for the same specialist. A given Preferred Provider can be in CARA or NPCC/APO, but not both simultaneously. An ACO could have its cardiology group in CARA (with episode-based accountability for PCI and heart failure) while putting its orthopedic group in NPCC (with capitated payment for all orthopedic services).
